Artist complaints against Midjourney, Stable Diffusion and DeviantArt

A group complaint was discarded against Stability Diffusion, Midjourney, and DeviantArt for copyright infringement, privacy rights violations, unfair competition, and violation of the Terms of Service.

The lawsuit was filed by a class action law firm in California and New York in cooperation with attorneys from Lockridge, Grindel, Nauen PLLp. She is demanding compensation for damages caused by companiesand an injunction to prevent future damages.

According to the complaint, Stable Diffusion is an artificial intelligence product used by Stability AI, DeviantArt, and Midjourney in their AI imagery products. It was trained on billions of copyrighted images contained in the LAION-5B database. downloaded and used without compensation or consent of the artists.

If Stable Diffusion and similar products continue to function as they currently do, They will replace the artists whose stolen works power these AI products they compete with. AI image products are not just an infringement of artists’ rights; whether they like it or not these products will eliminate the “artist” career.

In addition to seeking redress for the wrongful conduct, this lawsuit seeks to prevent that outcome and ensure that these products follow the same rules as any other new technology that involves the use of large amounts of intellectual property. If music streaming can be done within the law, so can AI products.

Several companies are being sued for developing products that use AI and violate the rights of artists and creators.

As booming technology continues to transform every aspect of the modern world, it is vital that we recognize artists’ rights and protect them from illegal theft and fraud.said Joseph Saveri, founder of the Joseph Saveri Law Firm.

He continued: ” This case represents a broader fight to protect property rights for all artists and creators. »

AI should be fair and ethical for everyone‘ said lawyer-programmer Matthew Butterick. ” But Stability AI, Midjourney, and DeviantArt appropriate the work of thousands of artists without consent, without recognition, and without compensation.

As an advocate who is also a longtime member of the visual arts, it is my pleasure to advocate for my fellow artists and continue this important conversation about how we, the humans, want AI to coexist with human culture and creativity. »

Since its inception in 2000, DeviantArt has grown into a haven for artists from all walks of life. A fundamental aspect of DeviantArt community participation for artists is the practice of sharing digital images of their artwork. Today, DeviantArt bills itself as “the largest art community in the world” and hosts millions of images.

At the same time, he offers DreamUp, a product that illegally violates the rights of his own artistic community. To make matters worse, a lot of the training data for Stable Diffusion – which powers DreamUp – consisted of images scraped from DeviantArt without the permission of the artists who posted them.

DreamUp is a product offered by DeviantArt that allows users to create and share their own images using artificial intelligence tools. It uses stable diffusion technology to generate images from training data of billions of copyrighted images.

According to the lawsuit filed against DeviantArt, it was created using images uploaded and used without compensation or the artists’ consent. Because of this, she is accused of violating the copyrights of artists and the DeviantArt artistic community by using their works without permission or attribution.

It’s important to remember that Lawsuit against Stability AI, Midjourney and DeviantArt can be seen as “ambulance hunt”. because AI only creates variations of existing images, not exact copies. Copyright applies to the accuracy of the image, not its variations.

On the positive side, however, the law clearly demarcates the lines between what AI can do and what should be reserved for artists. One of the solutions to solve this problem could be to remove the works and artists from the training models used to develop the AI ​​products. It is important to continue discussing and reflecting on how AI can co-exist with image makers while respecting the rights and interests of everyone involved.

Leave a Comment